Find Maximum Non-decreasing Array Length
Time O(n) · Space O(n) · Official statement on LeetCode
Solutions
// Time: O(n)
// Space: O(n)
// dp, greedy, prefix sum, mono stack, two pointers
class Solution {
public:
int findMaximumLength(vector<int>& nums) {
int dp = 0;
int64_t prefix = 0;
vector<vector<int64_t>> stk = {{0, 0, 0}};
for (int right = 0, left = 0; right < size(nums); ++right) {
prefix += nums[right];
for (; left + 1 < size(stk) && stk[left+1][0] <= prefix; ++left);
const int last = prefix - stk[left][1];
dp = stk[left][2] + 1;
while (!empty(stk) && stk.back()[0] >= last + prefix) {
stk.pop_back();
}
stk.push_back({last + prefix, prefix, dp});
left = min(left, static_cast<int>(size(stk) - 1));
}
return dp;
}
};
// Time: O(n)
// Space: O(n)
// dp, greedy, prefix sum, mono deque
class Solution2 {
public:
int findMaximumLength(vector<int>& nums) {
int dp = 0;
int64_t prefix = 0, prev_prefix = 0, prev_dp = 0;;
deque<vector<int64_t>> dq;
for (int right = 0; right < size(nums); ++right) {
prefix += nums[right];
for (; !empty(dq) && dq.front()[0] <= prefix; dq.pop_front()) {
prev_prefix = dq.front()[1];
prev_dp = dq.front()[2];
}
const int last = prefix - prev_prefix;
dp = prev_dp + 1;
while (!empty(dq) && dq.back()[0] >= last + prefix) {
dq.pop_back();
}
dq.push_back({last + prefix, prefix, dp});
}
return dp;
}
};
// Time: O(nlogn)
// Space: O(n)
// dp, greedy, prefix sum, mono stack, binary search
class Solution3 {
public:
int findMaximumLength(vector<int>& nums) {
int dp = 0;
int64_t prefix = 0;
vector<vector<int64_t>> stk = {{0, 0, 0}};
for (int right = 0; right < size(nums); ++right) {
prefix += nums[right];
const int left = distance(cbegin(stk), lower_bound(cbegin(stk), cend(stk), vector<int64_t>{prefix+1, 0, 0})) - 1;
const int last = prefix - stk[left][1];
dp = stk[left][2] + 1;
while (!empty(stk) && stk.back()[0] >= last + prefix) {
stk.pop_back();
}
stk.push_back({last + prefix, prefix, dp});
}
return dp;
}
};
// Time: O(nlogn)
// Space: O(n)
// dp, greedy, prefix sum, binary search
class Solution4 {
public:
int findMaximumLength(vector<int>& nums) {
vector<int64_t> prefix(size(nums) + 1);
for (int i = 0; i < size(nums); ++i) {
prefix[i + 1] = prefix[i] + nums[i];
}
vector<int64_t> dp(size(nums) + 1, numeric_limits<int>::max());
dp[0] = 0;
vector<int> prev(size(nums) + 1, -1);
for (int right = 0, left = -1; right < size(nums); ++right) {
left = max(left, prev[right]);
dp[right + 1] = dp[left + 1] + 1;
const int next_right = distance(cbegin(prefix), lower_bound(cbegin(prefix), cend(prefix), prefix[right + 1] + (prefix[right + 1] - prefix[left + 1]))) - 1;
prev[next_right] = right;
}
return dp.back();
}
};
Beginner Explanation
What is Find Maximum Non-decreasing Array Length?
Find Maximum Non-decreasing Array Length (LeetCode #2945) is a Hard problem that primarily trains dynamic programming.
How to think about it
- Restate the goal in your own words before coding.
- Work a tiny example by hand so the invariant becomes obvious.
- Identify the pattern — this problem aligns with dynamic programming, greedy, prefix sum, binary search, stack, and two pointers.
- Only then translate the idea into code.
Why this problem matters
Hard problems force you to combine patterns and prove complexity carefully — interview gold. Official solution notes mention: DP, Greedy, Prefix Sum, Binary Search.
AlgoForge explanations are original teaching notes. Always open the official problem statement on LeetCode for constraints and examples.
Interview Walkthrough
Interview approach for Find Maximum Non-decreasing Array Length
Opening (30–60 seconds)
- Clarify inputs/outputs and edge cases (empty input, single element, duplicates, overflow).
- State a brute force so the interviewer knows you can solve it naively.
- Propose the optimal direction tied to dynamic programming, greedy, prefix sum, binary search, stack, and two pointers.
Core solution narrative
- Define the state you track (pointers, DP cell, set membership, stack top, etc.).
- Explain the transition when you process the next element.
- Call out time (O(n)) and space (O(n)) before coding.
- Code cleanly; narrate variable names.
What interviewers listen for
- Correctness on edge cases
- Complexity honesty
- Ability to discuss trade-offs (e.g., hash map space vs. sort + two pointers)
Follow-up questions they may ask
- Can you solve it with less memory?
- What if the input stream is infinite / doesn't fit in RAM?
- How would tests look for adversarial inputs?
Optimized Approach
Optimized solution notes
The reference solutions on AlgoForge target O(n) time and O(n) space.
Pattern focus: dynamic programming, greedy, prefix sum, binary search, stack, and two pointers
Use the pattern as a checklist:
- dynamic programming — confirm the invariant holds after each step
- greedy — confirm the invariant holds after each step
- prefix sum — confirm the invariant holds after each step
- binary search — confirm the invariant holds after each step
- stack — confirm the invariant holds after each step
- two pointers — confirm the invariant holds after each step
Multiple methods appear in the source solutions — compare them and explain when each is preferable.
Implementation tips
- Prefer readable names over micro-optimizations in interviews.
- Extract helpers only when they clarify (e.g., expand-around-center, DFS visit).
- After AC-level logic, re-scan for off-by-one and null checks.
Complexity Analysis
Complexity
| Measure | Bound |
|---|---|
| Time | O(n) |
| Space | O(n) |
How to justify this in an interview
- Time: count loops, map/set operations, and recursive branching; state average vs worst case if relevant.
- Space: include hash maps, recursion stack, and output allocation when the problem asks for it.
If your implementation differs from the reference, re-derive big-O from your code — never memorize a complexity you cannot defend.
Common Mistakes
Common mistakes on Find Maximum Non-decreasing Array Length
- Skipping edge cases — empty collections, single-element inputs, max constraints.
- Wrong invariant for dynamic programming, greedy, prefix sum, binary search, stack, and two pointers — updating state too early or too late.
- Mutating input unexpectedly when the problem forbids it.
- Off-by-one in windows, ranges, or binary search bounds.
- Ignoring overflow / precision for integer arithmetic problems.
- Overengineering — jumping to an advanced structure when a simpler approach works.
Alternative Approaches
Alternatives
The source file includes more than one method. Compare:
- Primary optimized path — best complexity for typical interviews.
- Secondary approach — often brute force, sorting-based, or space-optimized variant.
Practice articulating when you would pick each (constraints, readability, follow-ups).
Edge Cases
Edge cases checklist
- Minimum input size
- Maximum input size / time limits
- Duplicates and already-sorted input
- Negative numbers / zeros (if applicable)
- Disconnected structures (graphs/trees)
- Single path vs branching recursion depth
Pattern Recognition
Spotting this pattern
Signal phrases that point to dynamic programming, greedy, prefix sum, binary search, stack, and two pointers:
- Sorted input or ability to sort without changing the answer class
- Need for contiguous subarray / substring → consider sliding window
- Need for O(1) membership → hash set/map
- Optimal substructure + overlapping subproblems → DP
- Connectivity / components → graph DFS/BFS or Union-Find
Primary topics: dynamic programming.
Follow-up Interview Questions
Follow-ups
- How does the solution change if the input is a stream?
- Can you solve it in-place?
- What if duplicates must be handled differently?
- How would you parallelize the approach?
- Design tests that would break a buggy implementation.
Practice Recommendations
What to practice next
- Re-solve Find Maximum Non-decreasing Array Length in a second language (cpp, python).
- Drill 3–5 more problems tagged dynamic programming.
- Teach the solution out loud in under 5 minutes.
- Add this problem to your revision calendar in 3 days and 14 days.
Visualization
Study checklist
- Read the official problem statement on LeetCode
- Solve on paper / whiteboard first
- Implement the dynamic programming, greedy, prefix sum, binary search, stack, and two pointers approach
- Verify edge cases from the checklist
- State time and space complexity aloud
- Compare with the AlgoForge reference solution
- Schedule a revision session
Revision notes
Find Maximum Non-decreasing Array Length (#2945) — Hard. Pattern: dynamic programming, greedy, prefix sum, binary search, stack, and two pointers. Complexity: O(n) time / O(n) space. Re-derive the invariant before coding.
FAQs
What is the time complexity of Find Maximum Non-decreasing Array Length?+
The reference solutions aim for O(n) time and O(n) space. Always re-derive complexity from the code you write in the interview.
What pattern does Find Maximum Non-decreasing Array Length use?+
It primarily maps to dynamic programming, greedy, prefix sum, binary search, stack, and two pointers, within the broader topic of dynamic programming.
Is Find Maximum Non-decreasing Array Length good for interviews?+
Yes — as a Hard problem it is a solid practice target. Pair it with related problems in the same pattern family for spaced repetition.
Where can I read the official statement?+
Open the official LeetCode page for constraints and examples: https://leetcode.com/problems/find-maximum-non-decreasing-array-length/