Maximum Path Quality of a Graph
Time O(\ · Space V\ · Official statement on LeetCode
Solutions
// Time: O(|V| + |E| + 4^(maxTime/min(times))) = O(|V| + |E| + 4^10)
// Space: O(|V| + |E|)
class Solution {
public:
int maximalPathQuality(vector<int>& values, vector<vector<int>>& edges, int maxTime) {
vector<vector<pair<int, int>>> adj(size(values));
for (const auto& edge : edges) {
adj[edge[0]].emplace_back(edge[1], edge[2]);
adj[edge[1]].emplace_back(edge[0], edge[2]);
}
return iter_dfs(values, adj, maxTime);
}
private:
int iter_dfs(const vector<int>& values,
const vector<vector<pair<int, int>>>& adj,
int maxTime) {
vector<int> lookup(size(values));
vector<unordered_set<int>> lookup2(size(values));
int result = 0;
vector<tuple<int, int, int, int, int>> stk = {{1, 0, -1, maxTime, 0}};
while (!empty(stk)) {
auto [step, u, v, time, total] = stk.back(); stk.pop_back();
if (step == 1) {
if (++lookup[u] == 1) {
total += values[u];
}
if (!u) {
result = max(result, total);
}
stk.emplace_back(4, u, -1, -1, -1);
for (const auto& [v, t] : adj[u]) {
if (lookup2[u].count(v) || time < t) { // same directed edge won't be visited twice
continue;
}
stk.emplace_back(3, u, v, -1, -1);
stk.emplace_back(1, v, -1, time - t, total);
stk.emplace_back(2, u, v, -1, -1);
}
} else if (step == 2) {
lookup2[u].emplace(v);
} else if (step == 3) {
lookup2[u].erase(v);
} else if (step == 4) {
--lookup[u];
}
}
return result;
}
};
// Time: O(|V| + |E| + 4^(maxTime/min(times))) = O(|V| + |E| + 4^10)
// Space: O(|V| + |E|)
class Solution2 {
public:
int maximalPathQuality(vector<int>& values, vector<vector<int>>& edges, int maxTime) {
vector<vector<pair<int, int>>> adj(size(values));
for (const auto& edge : edges) {
adj[edge[0]].emplace_back(edge[1], edge[2]);
adj[edge[1]].emplace_back(edge[0], edge[2]);
}
vector<int> lookup(size(values));
vector<unordered_set<int>> lookup2(size(values));
int result = 0;
dfs(values, adj, 0, maxTime, 0, &lookup, &lookup2, &result);
return result;
}
private:
void dfs(const vector<int>& values,
const vector<vector<pair<int, int>>>& adj,
int u, int time, int total,
vector<int> *lookup,
vector<unordered_set<int>> *lookup2,
int *result) {
if (++(*lookup)[u] == 1) {
total += values[u];
}
if (!u) {
*result = max(*result, total);
}
for (const auto& [v, t] : adj[u]) {
if ((*lookup2)[u].count(v) || time < t) { // same directed edge won't be visited twice
continue;
}
(*lookup2)[u].emplace(v);
dfs(values, adj, v, time - t, total, lookup, lookup2, result);
(*lookup2)[u].erase(v);
}
--(*lookup)[u];
}
};
// Time: O(|V| + |E| + 4^(maxTime/min(times))) = O(|V| + |E| + 4^10)
// Space: O(|V| + |E|)
class Solution3 {
public:
int maximalPathQuality(vector<int>& values, vector<vector<int>>& edges, int maxTime) {
vector<vector<pair<int, int>>> adj(size(values));
for (const auto& edge : edges) {
adj[edge[0]].emplace_back(edge[1], edge[2]);
adj[edge[1]].emplace_back(edge[0], edge[2]);
}
vector<int> lookup(size(values));
vector<unordered_set<int>> lookup2(size(values));
return dfs(values, adj, 0, maxTime, 0, &lookup, &lookup2);
}
private:
int dfs(const vector<int>& values,
const vector<vector<pair<int, int>>>& adj,
int u, int time, int total,
vector<int> *lookup,
vector<unordered_set<int>> *lookup2) {
if (++(*lookup)[u] == 1) {
total += values[u];
}
int result = !u ? total : 0;
for (const auto& [v, t] : adj[u]) {
if ((*lookup2)[u].count(v) || time < t) { // same directed edge won't be visited twice
continue;
}
(*lookup2)[u].emplace(v);
result = max(result, dfs(values, adj, v, time - t, total, lookup, lookup2));
(*lookup2)[u].erase(v);
}
--(*lookup)[u];
return result;
}
};
Beginner Explanation
What is Maximum Path Quality of a Graph?
Maximum Path Quality of a Graph (LeetCode #2065) is a Medium problem that primarily trains depth first search.
How to think about it
- Restate the goal in your own words before coding.
- Work a tiny example by hand so the invariant becomes obvious.
- Identify the pattern — this problem aligns with dfs backtracking.
- Only then translate the idea into code.
Why this problem matters
It sits in the sweet spot of interview difficulty: multiple valid approaches, clear trade-offs. Official solution notes mention: + 4^10)_.
AlgoForge explanations are original teaching notes. Always open the official problem statement on LeetCode for constraints and examples.
Interview Walkthrough
Interview approach for Maximum Path Quality of a Graph
Opening (30–60 seconds)
- Clarify inputs/outputs and edge cases (empty input, single element, duplicates, overflow).
- State a brute force so the interviewer knows you can solve it naively.
- Propose the optimal direction tied to dfs backtracking.
Core solution narrative
- Define the state you track (pointers, DP cell, set membership, stack top, etc.).
- Explain the transition when you process the next element.
- Call out time (O() and space (V) before coding.
- Code cleanly; narrate variable names.
What interviewers listen for
- Correctness on edge cases
- Complexity honesty
- Ability to discuss trade-offs (e.g., hash map space vs. sort + two pointers)
Follow-up questions they may ask
- Can you solve it with less memory?
- What if the input stream is infinite / doesn't fit in RAM?
- How would tests look for adversarial inputs?
Optimized Approach
Optimized solution notes
The reference solutions on AlgoForge target *O(* time and *V* space.
Pattern focus: dfs backtracking
Use the pattern as a checklist:
- dfs backtracking — confirm the invariant holds after each step
Multiple methods appear in the source solutions — compare them and explain when each is preferable.
Implementation tips
- Prefer readable names over micro-optimizations in interviews.
- Extract helpers only when they clarify (e.g., expand-around-center, DFS visit).
- After AC-level logic, re-scan for off-by-one and null checks.
Complexity Analysis
Complexity
| Measure | Bound |
|---|---|
| Time | *O(* |
| Space | *V* |
How to justify this in an interview
- Time: count loops, map/set operations, and recursive branching; state average vs worst case if relevant.
- Space: include hash maps, recursion stack, and output allocation when the problem asks for it.
If your implementation differs from the reference, re-derive big-O from your code — never memorize a complexity you cannot defend.
Common Mistakes
Common mistakes on Maximum Path Quality of a Graph
- Skipping edge cases — empty collections, single-element inputs, max constraints.
- Wrong invariant for dfs backtracking — updating state too early or too late.
- Mutating input unexpectedly when the problem forbids it.
- Off-by-one in windows, ranges, or binary search bounds.
- Ignoring overflow / precision for integer arithmetic problems.
- Overengineering — jumping to an advanced structure when a simpler approach works.
Alternative Approaches
Alternatives
The source file includes more than one method. Compare:
- Primary optimized path — best complexity for typical interviews.
- Secondary approach — often brute force, sorting-based, or space-optimized variant.
Practice articulating when you would pick each (constraints, readability, follow-ups).
Edge Cases
Edge cases checklist
- Minimum input size
- Maximum input size / time limits
- Duplicates and already-sorted input
- Negative numbers / zeros (if applicable)
- Disconnected structures (graphs/trees)
- Single path vs branching recursion depth
Pattern Recognition
Spotting this pattern
Signal phrases that point to dfs backtracking:
- Sorted input or ability to sort without changing the answer class
- Need for contiguous subarray / substring → consider sliding window
- Need for O(1) membership → hash set/map
- Optimal substructure + overlapping subproblems → DP
- Connectivity / components → graph DFS/BFS or Union-Find
Primary topics: depth first search.
Follow-up Interview Questions
Follow-ups
- How does the solution change if the input is a stream?
- Can you solve it in-place?
- What if duplicates must be handled differently?
- How would you parallelize the approach?
- Design tests that would break a buggy implementation.
Practice Recommendations
What to practice next
- Re-solve Maximum Path Quality of a Graph in a second language (cpp, python).
- Drill 3–5 more problems tagged depth first search.
- Teach the solution out loud in under 5 minutes.
- Add this problem to your revision calendar in 3 days and 14 days.
Visualization
Study checklist
- Read the official problem statement on LeetCode
- Solve on paper / whiteboard first
- Implement the dfs backtracking approach
- Verify edge cases from the checklist
- State time and space complexity aloud
- Compare with the AlgoForge reference solution
- Schedule a revision session
Revision notes
Maximum Path Quality of a Graph (#2065) — Medium. Pattern: dfs backtracking. Complexity: O(\ time / V\ space. Re-derive the invariant before coding.
FAQs
What is the time complexity of Maximum Path Quality of a Graph?+
The reference solutions aim for O(\ time and V\ space. Always re-derive complexity from the code you write in the interview.
What pattern does Maximum Path Quality of a Graph use?+
It primarily maps to dfs backtracking, within the broader topic of depth first search.
Is Maximum Path Quality of a Graph good for interviews?+
Yes — as a Medium problem it is a solid practice target. Pair it with related problems in the same pattern family for spaced repetition.
Where can I read the official statement?+
Open the official LeetCode page for constraints and examples: https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-path-quality-of-a-graph/